Re: I don't see why big blocks are a problem, even 10 MB blocks right now aren't.

First, you seem to not understand the _actual_ cost of running a non-mining, fully validating wallet. See my previous reply above. Second, your cheap skinflint demand to get a free ride by crippling the Bitcoin network is crippling the Bitcoin network. Your so-called 'contribution' to Bitcoin network security is a net negative.

Which is absolute nonsense and couldn't be further from reality.

Well, then you should have no problem disproving at least one portion of what I typed with evidence of facts and reasoning therefrom. Instead, all you've got so far is platitudes.

You have provided absolutely no kind of evidence, unless I've missed it and/or you've stealthy inserted it into some post. "Reasoning" is not evidence, considering you're a paid shill.

Which is again another assertion for which you have provided no evidence. What really makes it funny is that your gunbot sig makes you definitively a paid shill.

Quote

This is real evidence:

Quote from: Lauda on July 12, 2017, 04:51:32 PM

https://twitter.com/TuurDemeester/status/881851053913899009

Do you want a peer-to-peer network, or a proxy-to-proxy network?

Yes, that is evidence. Evidence that some percentage of Steam gamers will likely not be Bitcoiners in 2015.

That is a brain-dead criterium.

If you want to be a first-order member of the network that protects the most significant financial technology since the 1400's, buck up for a real machine. If not, your so-called 'contribution' to Bitcoin security is a net negative.