It'not wise if we judge terorist related with any religion. In any religion there are some terorist, murderer, bank robber so i guess it's not related with religion. Do we need to collect terorist activity in christian, budhism, hinduism?? For what purpose?? To show us if christians is bad religion, muslim is bad, budhism and hinduism too?? Oh sirry, no thanks. I wont do in that purpose. As an adult wh should think more wise, clear, and rational
If the root cause of terrorism is religion, then how can we ignore this factor? And you need to understand the difference between terrorism and crime. And till now, I haven't heard about Hindu or Buddhist terrorism. Could you please give a few examples it?
Fikihafana argues we shouldn't collect comparative data between religions on terrorist activity. How could that be right? Of course such matters should be studied. How else can we understand ANYTHING but by studying it? This is exactly the kind of attitude that holds the Islamic world back in science and engineering.
Many religions have been determined to be "bad" in the past. For example those which advocated sacrifice of humans and cannibalism. I can't see anything wrong with a scientifically objective comparative view of religions as "good or bad."
Of course on the opposite side we have the internal view of the Islam religion, where those who practice it are "good" and all others are "bad."