No. You are the one accusing me of being a paid shill. The burden of proof is upon you. Because, logic.
This is not even what we are talking about. Factually speaking, you're a shill. It does not need proving, especially not when you're diverting.
You are receiving payment for an advertisement in your sig. This is, by definition, shillery.
The latter is not even a word, and the foremost has nothing to do with my opinion on the hostile takeover attempt BU/ABC (or whatever scam name you try to use next time). Therefore, your statement is not logically coherent. Of course, your statements usually aren't.
Yes. I have reading comprehension. You, OTOH, have a lack of reading comprehension.
Enjoying that Ver and Jihad money, are you?
Quoted in entirety in order to memorialize your obtuseness, irrationality, and denial of logic.