You have obviously never won nor served an ex-parte injunction on a CEO before or their banks/IT suppliers....can do it in about 2 HRS Max.
I doubt this will be the case here.
Again, serving a piece of paper on someone is next-to-useless if it's not enforceable in that jurisdiction. Even if it is, that piece of paper itself can't actually force them to do anything and if you go kicking down their door and ripping out servers to "enforce" the order yourself, you're not going to be doing yourself any favours.
Oh and why exactly would this be ex-parte? That's not a simple threshold to meet and since they now can't argue that informing mtgox about the application could cause serious harm (since they've apparently already been served with it) or that there is an urgency issue (since they apparently have had time to issue and serve the application and they apparently didn't bring a successful motion at the time) so I'm curious as to whether you had a reason for saying ex-parte or you just threw it in there because you thought it sounded legalish.
You have never had your bank account frozen/garnished have you....that "piece of paper" can do both very quickly
ex-parte is a general term for seeking something (eg relief) when the other party is not present, you will note I said relief would be unlikely to be granted in this case, so thank you for agreeing with me. I for one however would not be leaving funds on Gox for a few days/week at least.