I don't see why those sending to the right address should be considered bigger victims when those who sent to the wrong address did exactly what the team of CoinDash wanted them to do. Waiting for the contract address on their webpage and then send the ether to that address. I fell for it, too. Of course, you can blame me on bad diligence, but then again the only strange thing I noticed was that ugly font/design when the contract address got released. And yet I am really not into these wild conspiracy theories claiming that it all was a planned scam by the developers. So when you didnt believe that this is a scam in the first place, what, except for the design of the announcement, should have made you suspicious? Dont get me wrong, I feel responsible for the mistake I made and I am pretty sure that if there wasn't that FOMO beginner mistake, I would still have my funds. Nevertheless I think everybody should be treated equally here if the company is serious. Simply because for the fact that people got told "do this, and you will get tokens from us". I did that. And I got no tokens lol, I even opened a MEW address because they advised me to do so, while MetaMask would have done good too I assume. Talk about diligence Of course, if CoinDash was a scam from begin on, all what I said is extraneous. The logic I am trying to impart here only applies when the CoinDash team is serious. My 2 satoshis. And another 2 here: https://steemit.com/coindash/@hawtoken/how-i-experienced-the-coindash-hack including a small chronicle of the events