KYC and then what ? naked pic ? suck dick ? 
I'm not anonymous and I'm not happy with Jean Luc posting on 9th while he should have done at earliest on 12th at decent time, if he wanted to. I can not understand that at all. But your personal affairs are not my business, and my business is already harmed a lot by the lack of equal treatment that I'm victim of due to your inaccurate instructions given.
So NOW it is time to stop playing games and RESPECT your part of the contact.
KYC is not part of the deal, when someone change a deal, we all know what it means.
1. Damage occurs NOW, so Cfb arguments are not strong enough to justify a change of deal.
2. Protection of anonymity is a human right, only absolute force majeur might justify me to go against such conviction, this is clearly not. I believe more than one will think the same.
Enforced KYC will then be perceived by me and by others as unjustified, opportunistic use of force, other than for some personal satisfaction, to violate respectable convictions and increase damage made to participant(s) whose treatment had already failed to be treated fairly.
So is it still an option ?
If Yes, I advise you take advise.
I'm not anonymous and I'm not happy with Jean Luc posting on 9th while he should have done at earliest on 12th at decent time, if he wanted to. I can not understand that at all. But your personal affairs are not my business, and my business is already harmed a lot by the lack of equal treatment that I'm victim of due to your inaccurate instructions given.
So NOW it is time to stop playing games and RESPECT your part of the contact.
KYC is not part of the deal, when someone change a deal, we all know what it means.
1. Damage occurs NOW, so Cfb arguments are not strong enough to justify a change of deal.
2. Protection of anonymity is a human right, only absolute force majeur might justify me to go against such conviction, this is clearly not. I believe more than one will think the same.
Enforced KYC will then be perceived by me and by others as unjustified, opportunistic use of force, other than for some personal satisfaction, to violate respectable convictions and increase damage made to participant(s) whose treatment had already failed to be treated fairly.
So is it still an option ?
If Yes, I advise you take advise.