If the agreement is not clear and does not provide a clear and unambiguous mechanism, then how the fuck they going to be on the same page regarding what it is that they are agreeing to do, exactly?
Dont worry, they understand what they signed. Its irrelevant you have problems understanding it...
Look at you. Devolving into nonsense.
If the terms of an agreement are vague, then you are not going to get unambiguous clarity about the terms.
So what are the terms that they understand?
They will support 2mb no matter what ? They will support hardfork no matter what? They will support attempting to change the governance of bitcoin no matter what? These are written or unwritten aspects that they supposedly understand?
They agree to running whatever fucking code is given to them, no matter what? Does that make sense? You may not understand what is an agreement. Usually an agreement has to be specific, and I recall looking at the Hong Kong agreement and a bunch of big block whiners claiming that there was some kind of breach... which was total bullshit because they were trying to assert that the agreement was above and beyond to what it was. remember that one?
Guess you remember last 2 days and how the price reacted due to the enforcing of agreements ?
We all are getting honored ONLY when we work together - not against each other !