It's funny how people who are overly critical of Dai all seem to define research and truth on this forum. They take the word of David Zimbeck as truth, and the hitpiece of a Coinjournal article which goes as far as to attack Caspal's Rubik's cube record, WRONGLY saying that Caspal does not hold any.

Here are the narratives I've seen so far with the conspiracy-prone skeptics: 1) Qtum is scam. They will take your ICO money --->  2) Okay, they haven't left project and taken ICO money but they will! ---> 3) They have probably already stolen the ICO money! We don't have txids (incomes third-party accounting firm that shuts these guys the fuck up).  ---> 4) They're just a pump a dump (for some reason, they continue to develop the project though...)



Here's a more neutral article for those who actually care about that stuff:
https://www.smithandcrown.com/qtum-controversy-patrick-dais-exit-bitbay/