Your premise about bigblockers being tricked through the segwit2x in terms of the 2x not being intended is ridiculous.
You can try to characterize this as big blockers getting 'tricked'. You're still not getting it.
BCC renders any such shenanigans impotent.
Well maybe I am exaggerating a little bit to make a point about your seemingly ongoing bitterness towards Core personalities,
Exaggerating. Indeed. But what "ongoing bitterness towards Core personalities" is this of which you speak?
or maybe your mistaken belief that there is a large level consensus out there for bigblocks than the reality of the matter?
No. The only belief that I have about some 'large level of consensus for bigblocks' is that it is larger than one would assume if one never ventured out of the BCT.org walled garden.
But here's the deal. I fight for what I believe to be good for Bitcoin. I'm not trying to win some popularity contest, nor be a happy lemming. I'm just energized that after years of inaction, or non-solutions being argued as the way forward, there appears on the horizon the potential of a Bitcoin drawn in the principles that I believe satoshi outlined.
You certainly don't come off as a dumb person - but you just seem to be engaged in ongoing nonsense of pushing your various conclusions about the supposed preferability of big blocks - and likely you remain deluded based on getting caught up in politics and a lack of willingness to accept the core process as legit and fair.
Fair? Fair is an alien concept in a permissionless environment. Do. Or do not. There is no try.
(Incidentally, your labeling of it as the 'core process' (again, in a permissionless environment) belies the blinders upon your eyes)
They really give a ratt's ass about supposed actual technical deficiencies in bitcoin
"There you go again."- R. Raygun
so someone on reddit says "bitcoin will not fork"
then i say, " segwit is cancelled? "
it was not well received
Legendary, by any name.
It's a moot point though. LN and other sidechains will provide more than enough bandwidth for Visa-like transaction volume.
Yes.
In an off-chain network* that exposes you to severe security holes. Even if you are online 24/7.
*If anybody ever manages to invent a trustless routing algorithm that works in an environment of random joins and random disjoins.