Cryptocurrency is not fungible by definition because it can be changed via power vacuum, while gold and silver are fungible because elements on the periodic table are immune to things like democracy or authoritarianism.
you dont have to work to hard, when your argument is right eh.
well markets will stay irrational longer then you can stay solvent.
will you cry when bitcoin breaks above 4000$
I'm entirely aware bitcoin can be pump and dumped to a larger number (or maybe it dies first) while having no fundamentals whatsoever in comparison to gold and silver as "money", and it's fundamentals as even a "currency" instead of money are also bad because you would have to get rid of the blockchain entirely in order to scale and convert to some emunie-like system with no state recovery at all, hence being even more unsound and fragile as a monetary instrument.
All I really care about is picking the asymmetric trade in the long run, and since bitcoin's fundamentals are poor as both money and currency, this definitely disqualifies it in the asymmetric trade aspect. People here like to pretend it's inevitable bitcoin goes to some absurd number like John McAfee, and what I'm saying is, no, there are no fundamentals backing that viewpoint at all. The only place I can find fundamentals like that are in gold and silver (mostly silver).