If they are not listing Veritas out of discrimination, whatever the type of discrimination is, then fuck them.
We don't need Bittrex. Let them go fish.
Edit:
By the way, if I were in charge, I would sue that corporate partner for 100% of the damages inclusive of having them recover 100% of all the tokens stolen (they can do it by acquiring them in the open market, if they incur higher costs doing so it's their problem), return all the tokens back, and I will put the tokens back into the reserve. And I will make sure to have this legal action made public so everyone can see who the scum is.
That's the "Victimize-me" view, truth is rather, that no exchange will accept a coin that only has a free-flow of 2%. Period. Accept it.
Because Reggie (and his team) could play the price up to 20 trillions or down to 10 USD without even paying anything for it.
So you can end this exchange discussion.
Firstly, it is a token, not a coin or cryptocurrency. Secondly, 100% of the circulating supply is available for trade at the right price. Big players also have the ability to buy VERI OTC from Veritaseum at a premium (the last time I checked: the market price + 10%). The market will determine the price (not low life losers who steal and try to crash the price). Thirdly, there are many tokens with a circulating supply of 2,000,000 and less that have been listed by Bittrex, Polo and other larger exchanges. Fourthly, pointing out an injustice is not a "Victimize-me" view, especially when it is backed by a fighting spirit based on a solution. Why do you think Dorky posted "whatever the type of discrimination is, then fuck them"? It is because Veritaseum and centralized exchanges such as EtherDelta don't need the likes of Bittrex in order to play ball. It would have been nice to get listed just like the others got listed, but it is certainly not the end of the world. Crying foul on the back of BS ("no exchange will accept a coin that only has a free-flow of 2%") is much closer to a "Victimize-me" view!