Last time I suggested it here that Veritaseum creates a FAQ that answers all frequently asked questions including the controversial market cap issue, but Reggie being a stubborn person that listen not to advice (sort of "my way or the highway" kind of attitude), ignore my suggestion and so until today people continue to bring up the market cap issue. And I am confident in the future different persons will bring up the same issue again. And the effort to explain the issue will be an endless one. The incapability to handle the issue well (including the hack issue) is the reason why I imply Reggie lacks good management competency. He can say that's untrue, but then the best I can say is he has average project management competency and that's about it. If only there was comprehensive FAQ in place, probably we won't need to face the same issue over and over again. If you feel frustrated over the market cap issue, it is because of your choice to let it persist.

The crypto industry is a new industry that will displace conventional/traditional business models, and require different ways of doing things, mostly on transparency, i.e. an ICO may be run by a private entity but that doesn't stop the entity from being required to be transparent to get the funding. This is an unspoken best practice. Reggie is tapping into this new industry. At the same time, he continues to use the conventional/traditional business models to justify what he is doing, i.e. comparing with Microsoft, Facebook, etc. That is not a good approach, in my opinion. Yes, I am referring to high standards, high benchmark to judge. This is because I am not participating in conventional/traditional business projects, but a new blockchain-based one with main themes like DECENTRALIZATION and TRANSPARENCY. I believe Veritaseum needs to work on these 2 themes if the team wants to survive well into the future.

It's good to be contrarian the right way, but not the wrong way. Or else there will be turbulence. I am saying all this because I care. If I don't care, I wouldn't even waste my time here criticizing like toknormal and others are doing. You need to be humble.

Edit:
Yes, you are not a programmer, not a developer, not a lawyer, not an architect, not a doctor, not an engineer, etc, which is why there is absolutely nothing stopping you from delegating the work to others to do the right thing. For you NOT being able to do so does imply that you are everything, i.e. a programmer, a developer, a lawyer, etc.