Bitcoin will always be just a currency alone and not money, and currencies derive value from transaction flow (scalability) not stock.
I think you said the higher the velocity the higher the value.
Regarding the velocity of money, if the increase in the use of Bitcoin leads to a decrease in need for holding dollars, it would increase the dollars velocity of circulation and tend to increase the money supply associated with any given amount of base money (currency in circulation plus bank reserves held with the Fed).
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43339.pdfYou have made your own distinction of money and currency that is not a commonly held distinction. Your entire argument falls apart under scrutiny which suggests you need to make more and more points so I cannot break it down.
Statements like this are empty:
This is why something is required to be an actual commodity, not a fake psuedo commodity (bitcoin) to be real money.
And bitcoin is a real money by and reasonable and widely held definition of the term money.
Like this empty statement:
so that even if everyone else on the planet dies, you are not left holding a worthless coupon.
Gold has great settlement value because its not very useful otherwise and it certainly wouldn't be useful if everyone else died. You haven't made any sense and nothing you are saying is accepted economic theory.