Second, did you even notice that all of a sudden, as soon as segwit2x was signaling intention, the mempool back log went to nearly zero and accordingly, the transaction fees and the and the delays went down to normal levels too. Get in touch with reality and stop citing misinformation and fantasy to support your stupid ass theories about bitcoin supposedly being broken. Roger cites this same kind of pie in the sky nonsense that is out of touch with reality; however, the fact that a whole bunch of you big blocker nutjobs are citing the same wrong facts does not make them any more true... and don't come out saying that there are various versions of truth because there are not.
About this. IMO this might have happened coz many people stopped using bitcoin and mempool was not so stocked, fees reduced accordingly.
You are living in a dreamland, and stating facts that are counter to real logic and dynamics.
There have been all kinds of usage in the past few weeks, and the mempool remains without much of any backup and with very low fees. The spamming stopped a few weeks ago.. not a coincidence, but big blocker nutjob miners stopped aiming their mining power at attacking the network... at least temporarily.
So basically you're saying that all these delays were due to "testing" of the system. Can u explain me - has 1Mb block enoughcapacity for at least 1/8 of population of Earth to use Bitcoin without interruptions? Given that no one is testing Bitcoin network? Cause if it is, then Core was coerced to implement Segwit2x? Was it blackmailing?
Peter Rizun says that definition of Segwit is contradicting the very foundation of Bitcoin, that was laid out by Satoshi himself. What's your opinion on this matter?