Why do people insist on calling Core's Bitcoin the 'real' bitcoin.
Because Core literally is Satoshi's creation.
Core is not the same team of developers that it was back when satoshi was around. You have to understand that in a permissions system, any and all implementations and forks can exist. The debate that's really going on is whether they think BCH is viable as a currency and whether its developers are competent, but some people weirdly delude themselves into acting like only Core could
ever be competent, and that seems like a dangerous mentality which you're on the brink of having.
What's the interests for most miners to switch? I don't see any.
You are incorrect. In the long term, miners will just follow the economy. If BCH is given a price of 0.25 BTC, then in theory it would end up with 1/4 of BTC's hashrate.
They wouldn't do it exactly, but just like how a lot of GPUs are being bought for altcoins, it's all about the pursuit of profit.
Lots of profit to be made for the unbiased, risk hungry trader.
I agree. I think that people let their opinions get in the way of their judgement. Even if you don't like BCH at all, you have to recognise that it could easily have a lot of hype in the future with the right whales.