[edited out]
The problem here is that you can and you will find flaws for all solutions, and you can just repeat same phrases from you against SW like this
A: SW is tested and safe lets do it
B :Sounds very speculative and hypothetical to me.
A: No things are different in production compared to testnets, because miners dont cheat there....
.....
This type of discussion will never end since there are just no proper assesments behind and mathematical logic applied, missing probabilities for the desasters to happen.
What process do we need to agree upon a final logical assesment that anyone accepts as a proof?
O.k. I will admit that I was being a bit flippant in my last post, but that is not merely because I am lacking in substance, but possibly the frustration (and maybe even humor) in the fact that a lot of you big blocker nutjobs want to continue to argue about a done deal. seg wit is going to lock in and to activate, so what fucking good does it do to keep complaining with a bunch of bullshit arguments that segwit does not work when it has not even gone live yet?
There is a process for getting these kinds of things passed. Segwit passed through the process and neither 2mb upgrade, nor hardfork nor changing governance passed. Yeah those others were proposed, but they did not get accepted through the process. So, now we are on the eve of activating segwit and a bunch of nonsensical specualtion about all the things that it supposedly cannot do.. blah blah blah.. and we have not even seen the first generation of applications built upon the thing and then going live on the thing.
I'm looking forward to finding out what kinds of things are going to be built upon segwit and therefore it looks like we are truly entering into exciting times in the coming year or two.