You countered a trust rating without even reading the reference link?
There are no threats in the reference link.Another example of why I don't trust your ratings...
Another example of you trying to find excuses for invalid exclusions.No, this is called explanation of a hypothesis using facts.
These are not facts, but your interpretation of other people's doings. Just because you think Hellot is "extorting you" that doesn't mean that he is, and most surely that doesn't make it a fact.Sounds like you're paranoid and making false allegations. You are the one who has stated you counter my ratings, not the other way around.
Neither is the case. At least I do not attempt to hide counter ratings by disguising them as valid ratings which conveniently get posted after mine. Then again, you trust extortionists/blackmailers such as defcon23. Why are you complaining about Hellot's alleged "extortion" then? 
There's really no reason for this petty bickering. I did nothing wrong. That is clear for everyone to see. Refunding a sending address with a user's consent is perfectly reasonable and the fact that it turned into this public display should be enough for any reasonable person to determine what is really going on here. I'd like for that to be my last comment on this subject.
I don't care about this particular situation as it has generate too much noise. The rating on Hellot is what I disagree with, and couldn't find any remote basis for it.