As many of us know he seems slightly unhinged now, his recent spat with me where he refused to allow the community to decide a very simplistic bet.
Oh wait, I remember that argument! That's the one where you created a poll for the community to decide if OG Nasty won a bet with you?
The community voted that he DID win the bet, they voted 26 to 18 in favor of OG Nasty. (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1946142.0)
If the community voted that OG Nasty won the bet, why would you use that as a reason why the community should vote against him now? Do you have any actual reasoning or logic or facts that indicate that OG Nasty isn't trustworthy enough to continue to be the treasurer? Has his credibility failed recently or are you just looking to get him relieved of his responsibilities for personal reasons?
Og did NOT agree to let the community decide.... I did the poll anyway, if he had agreed to let the community decide I would not of pushed the point.
this poll now is about the fact he refuses to consider multi sig, the fact I think he is a prized dick isn't the reason for this poll - that is a seperate issue.
3 people have voted that they have had issues with his escrow service (I was not one of them) if Og was the amazing escrow he made out then the poll would be siding a lot heavier with him.
oh - plus you are still a twat...