Well, what did Cash supporters expect? To reinvent BTC, get it for free and then have it replace Core???
1. Bitcoin is not "Core". Bitcoin is permissionless and has more than one dev team. If Core were to control everything forever and people supported that, Bitcoin would be centralised.
2. A fork is not "getting it for free". It's bringing competition into the market. Whatever the market perceives the strongest coin to be will be the strongest coin. If the price was high you'd call it a pump - do you really have so much confirmation bias that you would use the price to hate Bitcoin Cash regardless of what actually happens?
I'm sorry but not everything is a conspiracy against you. Please get over yourself.
I think the developers of BCH should run ICO first
ICOs are a terrible means of distribution and always will be. Mining is far better to distribute a new coin and a fork is a good way if you're trying to engage Bitcoin users, because it has the same distribution as the longest-running cryptocurrency (Bitcoin).
More like plan to milk some quick bucks out of some quick copy-pasta of the original SegWit code.
Bitcoin Cash are very explicit about their opposition to SegWit and they did not implement SegWit into their code.