Yeah, you wouldn't. You can attempt to debunk the fact that Polo holds MY property that I deposited into their exchange, but that's a fool's run and a waste of your time. Please refrain from injecting your undereducated opinion in a logical discussion, kthnxbuhbye.
'kthnxbuhbye' Is a very strong logical argument.
IANAL, but i'm pretty sure, we are all very good informed about the fact in which timeframe the split will happen and even are informed about the side-effects about _any coin or token which may be in transit within that timeframe_.
Poloniex even stated very clearly, that they "might or might not" support BCC at all.
So .... good luck with your case at any court, i would not bet to much money on that. But hey.
What are we simple users against such a strong; 'kthnxbuhbye'
P.s.: Insulting others does not make the others look bad at all. 8-)
I have no intentions of suing them; they're giving me my property. Whatever they said they would do to support the BCH token on their exchange or not does not change their own TOS that states the tokens I (as a customer) send to them are my properties. This would be the public and private keys to the BTC, which would include all assets associated with them. And seeing as they set a precedent in the past with ETH/ETC, yes those BCH associated with the BTC private keys I've sent them are indeed mine and should be rightfully credited to me.
As far as the little insult spin goes, it was a jab at the myopic down-talk, much like this is.
p.s. your mother.