Can anyone here using this solution confirm one thing that I've noticed for awhile now?  I usually gauge my rig's performance by the # of shares submitted / hour.  It's usually a rough estimation after a couple of hours of mining and I notice often the highest hash rate doesn't necessarily correlate with share submit rate.  The pools I use usually are prop or PPLNS and really sharefinding is how we all find blocks.  The reading from claymore/ethminer is a just a spit out of the current calculation our gpu thinks it can do and reports to the pool that later on will make a judgement on.  I've done all the fine tuning on my cards to the point where I trim back the mem overclock just enough to not incur mem errors on HWIN64 and max out my share rate.  So my hash rate maybe a bit under avg yet my % for the block round is higher than expected.  Essentially i try to punch above my weight class.

So back to my orig question:  Have you guys noticed a commensurate increase in share sub/accept rate along with the uptick in 'reported' hash rate?  Because if it's all the same I'd rather not push my cards further if it doesn't actually give me any tangible benefit other than bragging rights. 

Thanks