You are right. It's basically all about protecting customers and doing everything within the law (none of us wants to support terrorists or any other criminals).
After receipt of identification documents, do you compare the name with an existing list of terrorists or do you have to send requests to Interpol each time?
I meant this like that we follow standard steps against money laundry and other illegal activities whcih can in the end endanger other people.
Exact procedures know only a limited number of people to achieve the greatest security and privacy of our users.
AML laws require to check the identity for amounts above $10,000
and prior to a deposit.
And this confirms that you do not follow AML laws or try to prevent illegal activities!
Your behaviour strongly indicates that you act for your
own financial benefit.
As far as the anti-money-laundering limits go, a lot of it has to do with the industry you are in. For example when I worked at Betfair and subsequently Unibet, there was a constant emphasis on meeting obligations around anti-money-laundering legislation.
Obviously gambling is seen as a high-risk area area for money-laundering, especially Oshi, being a Cryptocurrency casino.
As I understand it there is no single rule about transaction size. I think it's more to do with perceived risk of money laundering happening. And bear in mind that if we or other casinos like us are investigated by one authority or another, it's because they believe they have sufficient reason to do so. I don't want this kind of investigation and therefore we are thorough about 'know your customer'.
And does it make us money if we 'know our customer'? No it doesn't. Why? Because we don't seek customers from jurisdictions were not licensed for and so:
a. It's unusual for us to find customers from jurisdictions we can't serve
b. Following on, we rarely end up withholding winnings from these people, because they're rare in the first place.