You are splitting hairs in order to justify your cockamamie ideas.
Based on your statement, you intend to skirt the law/buck the system by way of your proposed implementation of such an absurd/silly concept. That's the fact that I'm referring to.(...)
A fact is something you can prove.
I did not intend on using that feature even if it were implemented; I'm an investor, not a coin user. So again you are referring to your subjective thoughts and opinions as "fact". This makes you a rumor-mongerer at best, and a manipulative bully at worst.
In either case, my interactions with you end here. (I'm sure you don't care; just saying it so you don't expect replies from me in the future.)