"BTC-e attempted to conceal that it provided services to customers located within the United States."
I wonder where the rationale behind this statement comes from.
It seems odd that they would attempt to conceal something unconcealable - I wasnt aware that it was even supposed to be secret
Maybe lawyer speak for "did not require the users location to be given" or "did not provide information on users when requested"
This is a bizarre case of US overreach - impounding funds of non-US citizens trading on a non-US exchange . WTF is next, are they going after aliens trading through space the US once passed through?