I understand how you might not be interested, but it wasn't proposed "just for the hell of it", but rather to decide relevant group standards and allow them to submit disputes to binding arbitration.
Still not desirable in the least. As it is, the internet is a completely free medium, minus a few states' attempts to monitor and control access to it.
If you're trying to make order out of the anarchy that still exists online, then you're clearly in the wrong community as it's the bitcoin-loving anarchists who will fight you the hardest.
This would be used for things that matter, such as contract enforcement, not trivialities.
Have you even been to Judge.me?
You don't need any kind of a national structure to enforce contracts. In fact I bet one day there will be a free-market law based in software, much like bitcoin is a free-market money.
All functions of state need to be decentralized, not the other way around.