Glad you realized the difference and appreciate your honesty. I am actually the developer behind hubcoin.cash and I intend to launch the product really soon. My proposed ticker would be HCN (I saw yours is HUB).
What can we do to continue both our missions but avoid confusion? I respect your ideas and your development, but HCN was there before, even if it wasn't listed on CMC. There is even an asset issued on top of the NXT blockchain with that name, specifically to avoid collision (once the actual HCN blockchain will be live, that user issued asset will be converted to the new blockchain).
Maybe we can find together a new name or approach for your project in such a way that it wouldn't collide with Hubcoin.cash? Maybe Coinhub? It seems more appropriate for what you do.
Let me know your thoughts.
Best of luck, Dragos.
Hello, I cant change name so late, sorry.
It will affect peoples and investors who bought Hubcoin on ICO.
As we spread press release on hunreds sites and finished ICO, Hubcoin will associate with our project anyway and changing name may not help.
I think this way is bad for your project too.
You should have created Hubcoin thread on Bitcointalk.org.
I really tried to avoid collision and did everything I could, but it was impossible to found your project before.
What about changing your name to Hubcash?
It is not so painful as your still not launch project, but changing name on live project with finished ICO, exchanges, and spreaded release is deadly.
For my opinion, Hubcash also sounds great, and possible even better than Hubcoin.
(As Bitcoin Cash was launched a couple weeks before, peoples will remember Hubcash very well and it may help in promotion.)
Or may be lets discuss any other ideas without changing project names?
It have some advatnages too: you gaining additional popularity from Hubcoin before start and we can cross promote both projects.
May be a bit confusive, but if we put some tiny banners in the top of the site, problem will be solved, I think.