We've already covered that, my entire point can be summed up as "bugs is a weak argument, here's a better one". Not sure what there is to argue with.
No. Your argument is useless and not even relevant. Spoetnik makes better arguments. 
Like it or not, it's part of the anon-crypto market, automatically making it a competitor to all the other anon-cryptos. If you think the word "competitor" gives DeepOnion too much credit, well that's just tough.
It is neither. Just because you claim it is something, or part of something, that doesn't make it so. That shitcoin is worthless (outside of the realm of speculation) and will not be competing with anything. Lauda, that is exactly the point, and NOW you are exactly right. Just because you claim it (DeepONION) is a scam doesn't make it so.