Sure, they burned thousands of dollars worth of tokens... but when burning tokens is the defining aspect of your model, is that really that admirable?

The devs seem to be all about avoiding raising red flags over as long a period as possible. Burning "$200,000" of tokens prevents them losing more than "$200,000" of value (through investor dissatisfaction and suspicion) on the tokens they still possess. When so much else is lacking, it really isn't anything to applaud.

Being upfront with investors in terms of their identities and meeting promises regarding the greater transparency shown in the 'apparently' upcoming website is the most positive thing the devs could do at this point. Unless they're planning on undertaking a major re-branding, all that waiting to engage in marketing does is imply that the project is at the back of a long list of other priorities (that are of ZERO advantage to QAU holders).