You answered with wrong account, Macht was talking to Joking313. LOL, you just admitted using multiple accounts.
And BTW Poloniex is the worst example, it's mainly because of them we need new, transparent exchanges. Plus they never had the biggest volume, not even close. And there are a few new exchanges doing ICOs, none of them hide the team names (Mothership, Hcash).
The guy mentioned me... I know Polo sucks thats why I have hope for WCX. It's a good business case too. Mothership are very small, they raise like $5M. WCX already has like $10MM in presales. It's a different scale. Plus the fact that they're doing it doesn't make it right. I think they're completely nuts to reveal private key holders if they're running a centralized exchange. I've already explained my reasoning it makes zero sense from security perspective. Why put customer funds and directors at risk? what benefit? bitfinex directors are known and customers lost funds. same with mt gox .
If you dont trust thats your right and individual problem, but then you wait for exchange launch and by the quality you can tell immediately how pro or amateur the team is...