@crys
I appreciate the level of qa you want for the miner guys,
But here's just a heads up, signatum only have pow until 100k blocks then it will go pos. As of writing its already almost on half of it.
we know ...
our CWIgm-0.9.8 has a decent hashrate - but is buggy in a few areas ...
among these bugs - we need to iron out a few more things before we bring the next version for testing ...
we have always said - optimization is NOT our goal yet ...
we CAN - but we need to stay focused on the code ... stability and ease of use of CWIgm is where we are at ...
signatum is not the only coin that will be the beginning nor the end ... it IS huge yes - but its NOT our priority - our code is ... even so - as said earlier - CWIgm-0.9.8 STILL has a decent hashrate - and unlike a LOT of the miners out there - the hashrate itself is not that important - its the way it processes the shares ... a LOT ( and no - im not pointing at any one 'mod' ) of the miners out there can show hashrate - but have very little effect on how much it processes and how many blocks they solve ... there is a good reason for that - and the number that the miner shows on hashrate is NOT the important part ... its the processing that matters ...
we are working towards a better miner - and this will involve a number of algos ... not just one algo or one coin ...
#crysx