Cryptoslave has not been active on this thread since July 10, 2017, 09:48:55 PM.
Is he the main developer of this project?
If this coin needs MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, then it is better to leave it alone at NOVAEXCHANGE, because too many exchanges at this premature stage will only make it difficult to upgrade the Network in the future.
PLEASE STAY WELL AWAY FROM YOBIT !!! 
The only major development ANC needs at the moment is the integration of the zerocoin protocol. Cryptoslave has updated the desktop and portable wallets and the network explorer. I2P is also working well, therefore, if zerocoin works, we could have one of the best anonymous coins in the market.
Let the zerocoin protocol developers come around, so that we can all reach an agreement.
There was discussion with them. They preferred the insecure and centralized variant...
Could you please specify when the discussion took place, who participated with the discussion and what variants have been discussed. Thanks.
I personally can only remember a member of the community having spoken to some developers on the i2p chatroom and being told how much it would cost to integrate the zerocoin protocol. That is the reason we came up with the idea of doing a crowdfunding project to raise the money. He was quoted $20k and some members of the community pledged some of their anoncoins to help fund the project. However, the price of ANC was much higher then than it is today.
I think we need first for Cryptoslave to post again so we can find out what we need next. When I return to the UK, I will try to go to the chatroom and ask some questions about zerocoin to the developers there. Maybe Cryptoslave will be there. I think they might be able to help. However, the community needs to discuss here what our goals are and suggest how we can move forward as a community.
Another message:
There was one person who was willing to invest 500 Anc last night "C". Even if all we do is bring interest and an increase in value for ANC it may pursuade other developers to join the development team. It maybe that a developer is only able to complete a partial section. This may keep them loyal to the project if they've contributed so much. If we just think of the crowd funding as PR it may not be the revenue generator.
The developers seemed refreshed with the idea of bringing in new blood. It seems like their stuck and they need a nudge into investing their efforts into it again after so long of stuck progress. The great thing is that tgey haven't been idle and have been focusing on projects around the coin itself to improve infrastructure,duch as i2p and the exchange