Would meeting specification be an indicator of "production" quality level units?
What is the definition of "production" units before we ask for evidence.
There were nice unboxing pictures from the first Avalon...
There were nice stats and verifiable hash numbers put up...
There were certainly a number of different metrics used to evaluate that first machine from Avalon...
What have we got from BFL metrics wise on this machine as compared to those who have received them?
That is a telling situation and definitely points to something that is not PRODUCTION quality. Can you show me where anyone has done any in-depth analysis like the first Avalon?
Arrives
Reviews it next day in depth
Compared to the OP? Where are the reviews? Shouldn't they be posted somewhere?
After many, many, many months of waiting Im glad to report BFL has delivered. I received my first Jalapeño today!
This bad boy is getting 5.6 Gigahash instead of 4.5 Gigahash listed on their website. I'm thrilled about about the speed increase even though it's larger and takes more power.
For a $149 investment it'll repay itself and make $1300 on top in one month of mining.
Here are some pics for your enjoyment... View at imgur:
http://imgur.com/a/fHvMm#0