One thing that I think is sorely needed among these ICOs is a standardized list of terms. Some of the ICO whitepapers I've read have such horrible presentation and lack of concrete information that I can't imagine anyone investing anything in them, regardless of the potential of the concept. As someone coming from an environment where I have reviewed many (far too many) IPOs, the quality bar of ICOs needs to be raised.
I agree. A template term sheet with typical properties would both simplify comparison by participants and act as a quick sanity check for moderators too.
Works great on a torrent boards where a lot of similar releases get posted and otherwise need to be carefully sorted like "is this a reencode? what is the quality? what are the languages/subtitles etc?"