I might be interested into this ICO, but after reading the whitepaper I still have few questions.
Whitepaper states:
1) "Continuous Contributors shall from time to time confirm the execution of their roles on the
Platform to keep their status and depository wallets active. "
Given that both CC roles&figures and required engagement/KPIs haven't been detailed yet, there's a clear issue evaluating this project's demands.
What is the general demographic that the Blackmoon project is geared towards?
1) Fulltime Crypto investors and crypto believers, therefore the requested engagement/KPIs are generally high.
2) Mixed demographic, therefore requiring different rates of engagement/KPIs, but also allowing for quite low demands.
Furthermore, are Continuos Contributors KPI evaluated on single funds' specific regulation, or as a whole for the entire BlackMoon platform?
Personally, I believe that the Crypto market could thrive from opening itself onto larger demographics, simplifying its mechanics and allowing for a wider engagement from students and other classes of normal citizens.
Depending on the general required engagement/KPI to "confirm one's execution of a role", this project could either allow for a larger crowd or a selected niche.
This point is quite important, considering that whitepaper states:
"Continuous Contributors who do not execute their roles may have their status
recalled, depository wallet closed, and their deposited BMCs will be transferred to the holders
personal wallet without accruing any proceeds."
Illness, holidays, workplace demands can take anyone away from their CC role in this project.
Without enforcing the normal employment legislation, contributors could be identified as volunteers and be susceptible of losing their accrued proceeding.
I clearly understand that this project focuses a lot onto users' engagement, creating a community led to work together for a mutually shared gain; and it's totally fine that specific roles with higher KPI may get larger proceedings; yet I believe that enforcing high KPI roles, will destically limit this project's demographics.
If CC roles could allow for normal bounty roles as detailed in the bounty section, this project could attract a larger demographic.
So, overall, is there an official consensus if the Continuous Contributors' roles are geared towards extremely high engagement, or they allow for a mixed demographic with various and limited time to invest?