@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.
You don't answer my PM, but you ask me here? 
This PM?
Wondering what happened to you. You don't seem the same person from mid-late 2016.
Yes I ignored it.
You ignored my question. Maybe you already forgot.
-snip-
@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.
Removed previously perfectly valid trust ratings in order to manipulate the general history/view. Is in strong support of scammers such as Quickseller. Changing trust ratings on and off based on how he feels on a particular day.
Shorena does not seem alike to the person that I've used to know and have interacted in the past. I've stopped trusting them post their actions and strong support of said scammers.
@Lauda, care to elaborate which rating you are referring to? And if u need a signed message, just ask me.
Removed previously perfectly valid trust ratings in order to manipulate the general history/view. Is in strong support of scammers such as Quickseller. Changing trust ratings on and off based on how he feels on a particular day.
Shorena does not seem alike to the person that I've used to know and have interacted in the past. I've stopped trusting them post their actions and strong support of said scammers.
-snip-
Stating facts, i.e. that you're a confirmed scammer, is not ad hominem in any way.
Stating facts, i.e. that you're a confirmed scammer, is not ad hominem in any way.
Its exactly what ad hominem means, you try to refute the argument (you try to hide the discussion in private PMs) by talking negativly (is a scammer) about the person who (quickseller) made it. This does nothing to refute the argument, it makes you look petty. Not that this is new or anyone cares. So can we please drop this topic and focus on my question for a few posts?