Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Q: Should hilariousandco *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no
by
The Pharmacist
on 28/08/2017, 05:31:05 UTC
hilariousandco should not be a moderator because of his stance on extortionists. He currently has an extortionist on his trust list (Lauda), who has admitted to the extortion, not once, but twice.

If hilariousandco is the reason why an extortionist is on Default Trust, then what is the basis for trusting him to impartially moderate the forum?

For as long as lauda remains on hilariousandco's trust list, I believe it be appropriate to both remove hilariousandco from being a Global Moderator, and remove him from Default Trust.

I move to have hilariousandco removed from being a moderator and being on Default Trust effective immediately.  

This is Quickseller.

hilariousandco is a trusted member of this forum.  Quickseller is not.

/end
ignoring the fact your post is inaccurate, you are posting nothing more than an ad hominem attack and fail to address the issues behind my post.

You are clearly either unable or unwilling to argue points intelligently. Until you are willing to argue the topic based on merits and not based on emotion and not based on ad hominem attacks, please refrain from posting in this thread.
It's not emotional. You're a scammer and have no business engaging in a discussion about ethics or who should be in DT.  You've proven yourself unable to comprehend what it means to be trustworthy.  Your view of right and wrong is severely distorted.   I would also add that the last dozen threads about lauda and hilariousandco failed to garner support,  as will the next 10,000 threads you or your alts start.  No one gives a shit about your personal butthurt vendettas.