They are both shit. Siacoin devs want to hardfork to add some billions of coins into their own wallets.
That info is wrong.
This was a post from a dev who was thinking out loud of how the team
could raise funds. This was never an official statement nor a team expression.
The Sia Devs are very open in communication, in this case maybe a bit too less sensitive.
Three days ago they got a grant and announced in Slack:
Nebulous has received a generous grant from INBlockchain, to be used for the development of Sia. Li Xiaolai quotes: "don't worry about money, just have things well done".As a part of this grant, we are committing to not forking the blockchain to fund development, now or in the future."
http://sia.tech/2017grant/The fact that devs even considered hardforking cash into their own wallets is a very huge red flag. I don't see how many members of the community were blindly supporting this because "The devs know best!" I can't get behind that kind of mindless support.
Better to hardfork or come up with a solution than start an ICO ( and leaving the team like what happened at Storj ) .
Second this team is engaged with the comunity and their roadmap really looks brilliant ,
https://trello.com/b/Io1dDyuI/sia-public-roadmapLast but not least i wouldn't trust Vaporware nor a so-called decentralized network that once 1 node dies the rest dies along with it like what happened with Storj,
https://www.reddit.com/r/storj/comments/6vg2r3/storj_network_down/You people need to start reading into stuff before coming out with fantasy statements