A lot of members from the community are helping with website, marketing, voting for exchanges etc.
Agree, but this dosen't give you the right to say that is your project and make decisions in the name of Jon.
The developer should be open to criticism from the community too.
Criticism is one thing, making the dev lier, scammer or lazy is not.
If the dev has no time in implementing the promised items, all the community is asking is get another dev/devs on the team and get it rolling.
To get another dev on the team is one thing, to replace him is another thing. I'm sure he is open to such a proposal, he have/had 3 more Asst. Devs as you may see on the Team.