...
Hey,
nice to have you here

I really like your ideas, especially that it doesn't need to be a full takeover. Offering a working client which is compatible with the network would involve way less difficulties the only "problem" would be to spread the word about the new client and get users and, more importantly, exchanges to run it. But that's nothing unsolvable, imho.
I'm inclined to at least give Crowe another chance to leave a reply, but then again, I wonder what for. We'll get the usual empty promises, talk about 4 dedicated developers only for QORA (who, by the way, could have coded a whole new operating system by now if they actually existed and coded all the time since they got "employed"), ppl will get euphoric and then, guess what: nothing will happen.
I was offered to join a chatroom dedicated to QORA developers, and it initially gave me some hope, but I guess I just fell for it again.
Maybe we could set up a communications channel for all those who are interested in actively moving the project forward, so we can organize and talk things through.
You're welcome to join:
https://t.me/joinchat/AUgGYEIRnFsqwOIVA3aJxghttps://t.me/projectqora.edit: updated invite link.
.edit2: added public link
Yup, we need a MVP that just works, and wont use all available RAM.