Re: [ANN] INTENSE COIN - Blockchain backed decentralized VPN - Hybrid PoW
02-09-17 1300 UTC: The pool is running again following some daemon code adjustments for block sizes. Thanks for your patience. http://intensecoin.com/pool/
DigDeepMining, I apologize but I don't have time or patience to keep reiterating what was previously stated in the thread. Not to mention in the roadmap there is an image depicting a very specific exchange (coinexchange).
NO NEED TO SHOUT AND BE A IDIOT ABOUT IT BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE ASKING QUESTIONS!!!
I defended this coin when people kept calling it shit coin telling them give it time, but then I keep seeing people asking a different questions, most if not all of which never get a reply. Yeah we all seen the road map but it doesn't really tell us anything about exchanges no ETA no nothing, yeah I could make a coin and say its gonna be on x, y and z exchanges doesn't mean it going to be and doesn't give anyone any real info.
I appreciate you might be busy developing the coin etc but if you can't be bothered or have the time to answer the public's questions maybe you should look to bring in more help before everyone losses interest/hope in your coin
I apologize, I am not shouting. I use a larger font so my posts are distinguishable to people that are skimming the thread. 
Please understand that we want to be on an exchange, just like you want us to be on an exchange. These things take time. Especially with how many issues we have encountered with pool and transaction stability. No sense in putting the cart before the horse. We need to make sure our code, coin and pools are STABLE before we create further chaos by introducing exchanges into the mix. It's part of our roadmap and plans, but it takes time. The exchange was slated for September, and it's only been September for a couple days. Do not worry, it's still on our agenda.
Just a few days ago, we announced a ticker change from INT to ITNS because a few people shared some old news posts about 'INTCoin' being an ICO scam from some time ago. If we had already been listed on exchanges when we tried to make this change, it would have been much more complicated and confusing. We are taking things in stride at a pace that is reasonable. We don't want to repeat mistakes from our first launch day (hard fork) and rush things. Hastiness yields no reward in this arena.
You're right, you deserve answers and information. I was under the impression it was already established (in previous posts and the main post) that we would be using coinexchange.io initially. I will update you on this and say we are also considering HitBTC for the initial listing. We will then be expanding to Cryptopia and/or Livecoin in the following month.
Another reason for the delays and somewhat silence on the matter is we are still yet to find anyone interested in hosting a block explorer for the coin. CryptoNote uses different methods than BCT-based coins and requires a bit more work to host a BE, as the code is not just plug-and-play. We would prefer that a third party host the BE for obvious reasons (conflict of interest). At this point it looks like I may need to code one since we have failed to receive a response from any of the normal CryptoNote BE hosts - ChainRadar, Minergate, Democats. This is another bump in the road and will introduce further delay into exchange plans.
This is a great question I will respond to when I have some more time to compose a thoughtful response. Quoting you here so I do not forget!
DigDeepMining, I apologize but I don't have time or patience to keep reiterating what was previously stated in the thread. Not to mention in the roadmap there is an image depicting a very specific exchange (coinexchange).
NO NEED TO SHOUT AND BE A IDIOT ABOUT IT BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE ASKING QUESTIONS!!!
I defended this coin when people kept calling it shit coin telling them give it time, but then I keep seeing people asking a different questions, most if not all of which never get a reply. Yeah we all seen the road map but it doesn't really tell us anything about exchanges no ETA no nothing, yeah I could make a coin and say its gonna be on x, y and z exchanges doesn't mean it going to be and doesn't give anyone any real info.
I appreciate you might be busy developing the coin etc but if you can't be bothered or have the time to answer the public's questions maybe you should look to bring in more help before everyone losses interest/hope in your coin
Please understand that we want to be on an exchange, just like you want us to be on an exchange. These things take time. Especially with how many issues we have encountered with pool and transaction stability. No sense in putting the cart before the horse. We need to make sure our code, coin and pools are STABLE before we create further chaos by introducing exchanges into the mix. It's part of our roadmap and plans, but it takes time. The exchange was slated for September, and it's only been September for a couple days. Do not worry, it's still on our agenda.
Just a few days ago, we announced a ticker change from INT to ITNS because a few people shared some old news posts about 'INTCoin' being an ICO scam from some time ago. If we had already been listed on exchanges when we tried to make this change, it would have been much more complicated and confusing. We are taking things in stride at a pace that is reasonable. We don't want to repeat mistakes from our first launch day (hard fork) and rush things. Hastiness yields no reward in this arena.
You're right, you deserve answers and information. I was under the impression it was already established (in previous posts and the main post) that we would be using coinexchange.io initially. I will update you on this and say we are also considering HitBTC for the initial listing. We will then be expanding to Cryptopia and/or Livecoin in the following month.
Another reason for the delays and somewhat silence on the matter is we are still yet to find anyone interested in hosting a block explorer for the coin. CryptoNote uses different methods than BCT-based coins and requires a bit more work to host a BE, as the code is not just plug-and-play. We would prefer that a third party host the BE for obvious reasons (conflict of interest). At this point it looks like I may need to code one since we have failed to receive a response from any of the normal CryptoNote BE hosts - ChainRadar, Minergate, Democats. This is another bump in the road and will introduce further delay into exchange plans.
Dev, how is Intense different from let's say Mysterium?
What are the pros, etc?
What are the pros, etc?
This is a great question I will respond to when I have some more time to compose a thoughtful response. Quoting you here so I do not forget!