1) It is all a matter of perspective. If control and ownership are not synonymous, then it is irrelevant who owns it, but more appropriate who controls its actions. From my understanding the FED acts independent of government whose interest should be, the prosperity of the people.  If the Fed was under control of government it would let the "owners" audit the books. 

2) Or an Al-Qaeda funding body (can't prove it just saying), the question did not provoke anything to do with religion.

3) If you think of the New World in Historical terms, the world that materialised out of the monarchies and dynasties of Europe and Asia, then America and Australia are classic examples of the New World.  The reins of powered are very much rooted in the central banks of the world.  We are living in the New World now it isn't a conspiracy, the next world order "the conspiracy theories hype" won't be calling it the new world order, it'll have a new name. We are in the New World now, and it has an Order to it that isn't working to the benefit of the people, and can't be changed through democratic processes, so no need to call it conspiracy, it is fact.