This is a good point. How could seizing our shares and denying contracted services be legal in the least? Certainly it's not "more" legal than anything in the original contract. If the original contract violated any laws, then Mr. Gibson (not Nefario) has already violated them with the contract.
This apparent reappropriation seems like criminal fraud.
There is no "reappropriation".
US Law trumps any contract. The only way to keep Gigamining / Teramining going is to do what has been done. Otherwise, no one would be paid back payments or be allowed to continue.
Over 80% of all contracts have been claimed so you are now in the minority when it comes to who has taken the time to work with me.
If you have not claimed, please take the time to do so immediately.