Doubtful.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1903130.msg18971049#msg18971049(at the end of my post)
Of course it does. What are you talking about?
You can put anything you want in ToS. If it contradicts the law, it would be reputed null and void.
Ambiguous claim. Please point me to the section of the law that states that any attack on the Bitcoin network, i.e. any coins from a *duplicated* chain must be sent to the owners/senders of related BTC balances.
No need for that to be so specific. Property law 101.
I let you read about "usus" "fructus" and "abusus".
BCH here is the fructus of BTC. Hence as the owner of the said BTC, you are entitled to its product (BCH).
Source of the claim that it is because of lawsuits?
Indeed, no source for that. They would have been idiots to admit it.