Regarding this analysis - Alex (Propy CTO) answered earlier: "here are all the things they "got wrong":
for example, Propy's CEO has more than 12 years experience in real estate, is it relevant experience? - Absolutely
GitHub code - here: https://github.com/Propy/ethereum
internal exchange - that's actually on the border of being illegal, so obviously nobody has it
decentralization - Propy performs transactions on Ethereum, obviously decentralized. Someone asked why iOS mobile app is not decentralized - because it would be a bad idea for many-many reasons tokenization - I'm not sure what they mean by that, but we have a utility token which is required to facilitate transactions and P2P rent is not Propy's business, so why would they include it in the list is unknown the entire article is bogus"

+

Here is an answer from Melissa (REAL), August 31, 2017:  regarding "comparison chart" I agree with my colleague Xenia from PROPY "Nothing special. Obviously, the review was made by Atlant representative, aimed at showing his project in a better way than they are (check speaker's avatar, signature and WHERE he posted his groundworks). Such reviews should be made by 3rd party. I remember their representative spamming in our media. My conclusion is simple - they are trying to remind everyone about their selves using all options they can think of. Till now these methods are rather dirty. That's low."

Please make your own opinion and don't pay much attention to the charts provided by people with chip tricks.