You failed to call out anything with any valid information. You failed to call out bek77 for his spinning of information, but if I had to guess it fuels your narrative so there's no surprise is there?

The fact is that the price of trading of BCC at the time of China announcing ICO bans was lower relative to the price at the time that another poster (bek77) claimed the price was falling..
BCC is still relatively up (from the time of that news)
*opposed

All he said was "the price continues to fall", which in the current trend is true, if you want to talk about the longer trend then its pretty much sideways. You can pick arbitrary points to make it look any which way you like but I dont see the point in that.
Relative to what? Falling from what? You must see some point as you selectively chose to ignore the trading price for a global "normalized" price, yet you fail to use that same global approach to the market as a whole when the ICO China ban slammed the market, and here BCC is up...
Today is the 9th, the trading price is near what it was on the 6th, that is 3 days ago. Both of which are ABOVE the price it was at at the time of the ICO ban, which if we note the market tanked as a whole some $30+ Billion...
That you chose to minimize said poster, and nitpick what I'm saying says plenty...
"don't see the point in that" yet defends someone who does just that when another rebuttals that said someone for doing just that... carry on