Should BFL pull through and deliver their products to the masses hence fullfilling their legal obligation in these commercial transactions, those that have been blasting BFL with SCAM this or SCAM without any basis in fact could then find themselves on the receiving end of a libel suit.
Im glad you did not go with an insult but instead you go with deflect. Its carrot and then stick, right?
Its called free speech. If I think its a scam, I have evry damn right to say I think its a scam. If I say I have definative proof of a scam and I write an article in the New York Times about it, that's way different. People posting their honest opinion on an internet forum (many not in the US remember) is so obviously a case of free speach your threat falls
flat.
I see no reason to insult. This isn't person, just business far as I am concerned. I'm just stating what I see, no more no less.
Yes, you have the right to say anything you want within the rules of these forums. It does not matter whether or not your statements are posted in the New York Times or on these forums. Should the preponderance of evidence show that your comments (proven false by delivery of product) caused harm to BFL, then under civil law BFL has the right to file a tort against you. Would they? Depends on their mood I guess.
This goes back to yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire.