i do not know about high quality or not,
but the only thing that i am really sure about is they have their own taste and decision.
the only one who will pay them up are themself and even if we do not agree with their decision it was not our problem.
we should respect other decision and try to improve ourself.
can we have some respect for each others ? if you do not get listed then so be it.
Beautiful response indeed.
As I said, I am more than willing to be audited and audit the campaign manager in case any of the community members will point out a list of specifically suspicious / non objective choices.
We have actually reviewed the post history of every member carefully.
Ranking every member 1 - 10 according to the quality of the contributions (content), syntax and tidiness of the posts , and knowledge of the English level.
So far, we have only accepted candidates that scored 8 and above.
If you wish to discuss our decision with us, we are here for you.
Hey Razick, Mr. Campaign Manager will you be accepting more applicants next week? And what can you say about my post quality? In which I was not one of the members that are accepted, so that I can actually improve my post quality.
We rank each applicant on a scale from 1-20 based on a variety of factors including, but not limited to:
- Trust score
- Post length
- Posting consistency
- English fluency
- Number of posts
- Overall quality
Only applicants with a rating of
16 or higher are accepted.
Those on list 2 score
14+, and may be accepted in the future.
So you and your campaing manager have different scale for ranking applicant in this campaing?You are rating them from 1-10 and he from 1-20?
Big number of users apply for this campain and only few are selected,some may be disappointed with your decision but what we can do with that.This is your choice and all not accepted should move on.