You don't need to be lawyer. You can: 1) Consult your own lawyer. 2) Read the laws, do research and make a reasonable conclusion. If you can't sue people for "FUD-ing" Bitcoin, then you can't sue them for "FUD-ing" AMP.
Yes but have you done that or are you just claiming things without evidence? And keep in mind that there are different jurisdictions here.
And also your reasoning is not good. Some currencies are also trademarks, intellectual property, or such, so different laws apply to those.
Bitcoin is unique in this respect it's mostly public domain, public good, but that may not apply to others.
So if you haven't analyzed the law, for a specific event in a specific jurisdiction, then maybe you should not make claims like that.
No. I don't recall whether Steem was an ICO or not, but DASH was not (although this coin is arguably a scam by Evan, but that's a different debate). If you're running an ICO on mETH for a token, and you've not registered this sale, then it's an illegal security.
I see, I think you are a Bitcoin fanboy aren't you? Basically every other altcoin for you is shady isn't it?
I have experienced a lot this kind of mentality in the Bitcoin world, kind of resembles an echochamber. But the truth is that the other altcoins have just as much right to exist as BTC. This includes BCH as well.
Now don't tell me BCH is illegal too? That would be just hilarous

The law does not care about your opinion though.
Yes but I still have the right to say my opinion about this specific instance, however you have claimed these things to be facts, I don't recall you specifically saying that these are just your opinions.
You sound like you state things as if they were facts, which would be dishonest, until not proven, they are also just your opinions.