Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: 😇 vs. 👿 : 31 ICO's found with sub-standard cybersecurity practices
by
S9Capital
on 13/09/2017, 18:46:41 UTC
Blockchain security is a complicated task by itself, specially when it comes to ICOs where the team of contributors has not achieved the proper population/scale. Our aim here is to check for visible/invisible security hygiene and share that information back with investors who can choose to use it for modeling risk. At the end of the day, we want #CryptoHygiene grades to make retail investors feel safe and not worry if the projects they are investing in are susceptible to common vulnerabilities etc.  

https://www.securecoin.capital/single-post/2017/09/13/How-secure-is-your-new-ICO-coin-or-token-investment

Not sure what you mean by criteria. We have developed a set of services to help us understand how well the team behind an ICO manages their cybersecurity risks

What are the criterias for grading the ICOs?

I doublt your analysis will be full, without making an audit of smart contracts, for example. I was asking about such things.