Re: Does Binance do some diligence upon listing? SONM listing - Not moderated
Now as I psychologist (I have few degrees and psychology is one of them)
--- appeal to authority, first red flagI can tell you that he is primarily unhappy with what he considers bad investment on his part.
We can agree on that.
And he is bad investor because he doesn't understand investment fundamentals. He got frustrated with not getting his X whatever too quickly, lost all his tokens to some scam and now instead of accepting responsibility is trying to take out his anger on whom he considers to be the source of his problems. While the source of his problems is himself.
False, I published my complaints way before this.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1845114.msg19977427#msg19977427
Phishing happened over a month after this
https://ethplorer.io/tx/0x81c0b06b8fa2094957e51e3e825b228aa802eb3c29de7fdd7a68b4faff97627c
During all that period I could have dumped your shitcoin in liqui.io, to be honest I concluded your ''project'' was doomed and didn't give a damn anymore, then I got in a phishing address to set up the wallet for another thing. Thanks god they stole your shitcoin and not real assets. I didn't really felt much of a loss. My aim has being to call you out the whole time, what I did also over a month before the phishing:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1845114.msg20022540#msg20022540
I could have stayed quiet to preserve the value of your shitcoin in my own interest, so you are getting the intentions very wrongly here.
Now, much after this I started that thread only because your shilling machine got you considered to be listed in Binance, and Binance is a decent exchange that didn't do their due diligence and already have enough problems with the Chinese gov mess.
I wasn't attacking you my friend, I tried to understand your claims, since you've started with unpaid bonuses this is what I focused on. Obviously you have nothing to reply to the subject of the matter.
Sure all the detailed posts I've made are "having nothing to reply". I showed you a very simple math calculation, how much is 2.5% of 12,376? Your supercomputer people think it is 195.81. I hope that among your many degrees there is something related to basic math.
You also insist that the tokens were calculate at the time of the transaction being confirmed. Funny, because the transaction in ETH blockchain was confirmed by yourself, so this is just a very convenient way to deliver whatever you want irrespective to the confirmations I had in BTC blockchain. In other words: you didn't respect the confirmations of MY contribution, you used whatever the rates and bonuses of the time your supercomputer team sent me tokens. This is the same as me giving you money for 5 pieces of bread, waiting for hours and you coming back and saying you have only 4, charging the same price of those 5 earlier on.
If you wanted to serve the community by cautioning about SONM project that would have been a noble goal. But since you initial claims are false as it turned out what you are doing in reality is trying to cause damage to the project.
Typical poor rhetoric of qualifying a claim without ever addressing it.
If there was indeed unproper behavior of SONM team with intentionally calculating wrong bonuses I would be the first to support you in getting this resolved.
